BETTER THE DEVIL YOU KNOW THAN THE ANGEL YOU DON'T

On Wednesday morning, I woke up to the news of Republican candidate Donald Trump’s election as president of the United States of America on BBC. It hit me like an ocean wave and i was still recovering 'Was this really it?' i kept asking myself repeatedly.. It took me an hour or so to sink it in. How Donald trump had managed to win left me estranged to this new reality. So i paid close attention to the T.V set where a lot could then go on to be said of the election outcomes in the ‘swing’ states Florida, Ohio, Pennyslavia, but that to me was besides the point. A man who was a new comer to the U.S public political domain, represented a radical shift from conventional political rhetoric and labeled as a ‘demagogue’, grossly incompetent, e.t la. How had he won!  Of course there are lot of complexities when it comes to predicting American elections outcomes. The two main political parties i.e the republicans and the democrats dominate the political arena, and project themselves as the only viable vehicles for change almost similar to the choice between multinational big company coke or pepsi . The choice is limited. You either have a blue or red state, period. So, how did Donald trump win. The above mechanism partly answers the question in that over the years power has oscillated from one party to the other and this has been the cycle since 1989 up to present. Beginning with George walker Bush (republican) to Bill Clinton (democrat) to George. W. Bush (republican) then Barrack Obama (Democrat) till present. If anything, Hillary faced that disadvantage. To upset a cycle that has entrenched itself coupled with the fact that she represented the current existing ‘establishment’ was never going to be easy. The winds of change have always rode high in this American democracy crushing whatever it comes across and they particularly did so in the present election, never mind what a poor candidate Trump was perceived to be. Let’s remember that before 2008, most of the American society (white supremacists) would never see a black American take on the reins to lead their nation. Compare Obama’s racial bar with Trumps ‘hate’ speech, and you’ll appreciate the wind of change phenomenon that inevitably takes its toll against all odds. No doubt Hillary Clinton was the more fitting option, in the words of Obama justifiably labelled the ‘most qualified candidate to ever run for U.S presidency’. All opinion polls went in her favour and the winds of change threatened to side with her ‘being the first woman president’ but there was an added factor in play this time and that is ‘better a devil that you know that an angel that you don’t’ Trump may have been a political newbie, seen by many as a bigot, sexist even rascist et la. On the other hand, Hillary Clinton as experienced, competent e.t la. However, for all the good qualities she had, they were vitiated by her email scam. It crippled her campaign and portrayed her as a secretive corrupt politician. As secretary of state, using your personal email account to conduct government business is suspect notwithstanding that there was no wrong doing confirmed by the FBI. This did not help her campaign no matter her political correctness. Even the most ardent democrat would concede that this was a tough call to make i.e. voting Hillary or trump when the most obvious choice would be voting their democratic candidate. People don’t like dishonesty, the idea that somebody is manipulating the system dismays them. It is suffice to saying that 'am fooling each one of you minnows, s*ck it'. These are things Americans don’t take lightly. It is only in Africa where a leader declares unequivocally that they won’t be standing for presidency and later come around to withdraw as if saying ‘back then I was naïve I did not know what I was saying’ and we still let them stand and tap out from their promise. Quite clearly this was a choice between two evils, and people opted for a more brutally honest Trump who is not afraid to say that he would built a wall on the borders of U.S.A, deport unlawful immigrants and all other politically incorrect things. For all the misgivings people have against trump, he cannot be accused of seeking political correctness and why this was an unprecedented U.S presidential election.

While the world was recovering from the shock of Brexit, Trump was quick to commend the U.K for making such a bold decision to withdraw from the E.U thereby restricting freedom of movement across borders that comes with being a member state. In an increasingly globalized world, the idea that a country can restrict cross border immigration became tenable all of a sudden. And Trump represented a section of Americans who felt like they were being swallowed up in a more globalized world, an issue which trump manipulated to his advantage despite its unapplausibility considering the fact that America itself is a country that was built by immigrants, its diverse mixture of cultures and ethnicities, a country viewed worldwide as one of second chances (read the American dream), a country of endless possibilities et la. Surely, this is not a country that ought to close its borders to other people, it’s simply against what America is, the values that have built this nation and its national spirit for example the preamble of the American constitution highlights the idea of building a more perfect union between people of foreign descent and nationalities. This is simply not a country that should close its borders to other people. But these are realities that the world is facing especially hostility by citizens of respective nations to moslem immigrants even when their countries’ governments are willing to sympathize as is the case in Germany and France. Brexit is also attributed to the immigration concern that would cloud the U.K in case Turkey (dominantly Muslim) was later admitted in the European Union. Its citizens would have the freedom of movement in all European states as that enjoyed by other member states of E.U. Trump painted a grotesque picture of what would happen to U.S.A if it opened its borders to immigrants. He argued for example; what would stop 700 million people from one day flocking to the United States. Of course this is gibberish!!!, not in the least possible. We are talking about all the population of the south Americas combined entering U.S.A one day but it managed to play to the people emotions and most of them were unfortunately convinced. Trump has made a lot of unjustified statements which his supporters have galloped like fish in the water. That is the ugly beast of democracy. It is hard to imagine a democracy without freedom of speech. At the end of the day, trump cannot be faulted or prosecuted for speaking untruthful facts to unsuspecting masses of the American people. Trump’s election as president of the United States creates a dark cloud of uncertainty that hovers all over the current world affairs. Perhaps it’s time for a new dawn where globalization is seen as a threat rather than an opportunity. The people of the U.S.A have spoken. You cannot stop an idea whose time has come.