On Wednesday morning, I woke up to the news of Republican candidate Donald Trump’s
election as president of the United States of America on BBC. It hit me like an ocean wave and i was still recovering 'Was this really it?' i kept asking myself repeatedly.. It took me an hour or so to sink it in. How Donald trump had managed to win left me estranged to this new reality. So i paid close attention to the T.V set where a lot could then go on to be said of the
election outcomes in the ‘swing’ states Florida, Ohio, Pennyslavia, but that to me was besides the point. A man who was a new comer to the U.S public political
domain, represented a radical shift from conventional political rhetoric and labeled
as a ‘demagogue’, grossly incompetent, e.t la. How had he won! Of course
there are lot of complexities when it
comes to predicting American elections outcomes. The two main political parties
i.e the
republicans and the democrats dominate the political arena, and project
themselves as the only viable vehicles for change almost similar to the
choice
between multinational big company coke or pepsi . The choice is limited.
You
either have a blue or red state, period. So, how did Donald trump win.
The
above mechanism partly answers the question in that over the years power
has
oscillated from one party to the other and this has been the cycle since
1989
up to present. Beginning with George walker Bush (republican) to Bill
Clinton
(democrat) to George. W. Bush (republican) then Barrack Obama (Democrat)
till
present. If anything, Hillary faced that disadvantage. To upset a cycle
that
has entrenched itself coupled with the fact that she represented the
current
existing ‘establishment’ was never going to be easy. The winds of change
have
always rode high in this American democracy crushing whatever it comes
across and they particularly did so in the present election, never mind
what a
poor candidate Trump was perceived to be. Let’s remember that before
2008, most
of the American society (white supremacists) would never see a black
American
take on the reins to lead their nation. Compare Obama’s racial bar with
Trumps
‘hate’ speech, and you’ll appreciate the wind of change phenomenon that
inevitably
takes its toll against all odds. No doubt Hillary Clinton was the more
fitting
option, in the words of Obama justifiably labelled the ‘most
qualified candidate to ever run for U.S presidency’. All opinion polls
went in
her favour and the winds of change threatened to side with her ‘being
the first
woman president’ but there was an added factor in play this time and
that is ‘better a devil that you know that an angel that you don’t’
Trump may have been a political newbie, seen by many as a bigot, sexist
even
rascist et la. On the other hand, Hillary Clinton as experienced,
competent e.t
la. However, for all the good qualities she had, they were vitiated by
her email
scam. It crippled her campaign and portrayed her as a secretive corrupt
politician. As secretary of state, using your personal email account to
conduct
government business is suspect notwithstanding that there was no wrong
doing
confirmed by the FBI. This did not help her campaign no matter her
political
correctness. Even the most ardent democrat would concede that this was a
tough
call to make i.e. voting Hillary or trump when the most obvious choice
would be
voting their democratic candidate. People don’t like dishonesty, the
idea that
somebody is manipulating the system dismays them. It is suffice to
saying that 'am fooling each one of you minnows, s*ck it'. These are
things Americans don’t take
lightly. It is only in Africa where a leader declares unequivocally that
they
won’t be standing for presidency and later come around to withdraw as if
saying
‘back then I was naïve I did not know what I was saying’ and we still
let them
stand and tap out from their promise. Quite clearly this was a choice
between
two evils, and people opted for a more brutally honest Trump who is not
afraid
to say that he would built a wall on the borders of U.S.A, deport
unlawful
immigrants and all other politically incorrect things. For all the
misgivings
people have against trump, he cannot be accused of seeking political
correctness and why this was an unprecedented U.S presidential election.
While the world was recovering from the shock of Brexit, Trump was quick to commend the U.K for making such a bold decision to withdraw from the E.U thereby restricting freedom of movement across borders that comes with being a member state. In an increasingly globalized world, the idea that a country can restrict cross border immigration became tenable all of a sudden. And Trump represented a section of Americans who felt like they were being swallowed up in a more globalized world, an issue which trump manipulated to his advantage despite its unapplausibility considering the fact that America itself is a country that was built by immigrants, its diverse mixture of cultures and ethnicities, a country viewed worldwide as one of second chances (read the American dream), a country of endless possibilities et la. Surely, this is not a country that ought to close its borders to other people, it’s simply against what America is, the values that have built this nation and its national spirit for example the preamble of the American constitution highlights the idea of building a more perfect union between people of foreign descent and nationalities. This is simply not a country that should close its borders to other people. But these are realities that the world is facing especially hostility by citizens of respective nations to moslem immigrants even when their countries’ governments are willing to sympathize as is the case in Germany and France. Brexit is also attributed to the immigration concern that would cloud the U.K in case Turkey (dominantly Muslim) was later admitted in the European Union. Its citizens would have the freedom of movement in all European states as that enjoyed by other member states of E.U. Trump painted a grotesque picture of what would happen to U.S.A if it opened its borders to immigrants. He argued for example; what would stop 700 million people from one day flocking to the United States. Of course this is gibberish!!!, not in the least possible. We are talking about all the population of the south Americas combined entering U.S.A one day but it managed to play to the people emotions and most of them were unfortunately convinced. Trump has made a lot of unjustified statements which his supporters have galloped like fish in the water. That is the ugly beast of democracy. It is hard to imagine a democracy without freedom of speech. At the end of the day, trump cannot be faulted or prosecuted for speaking untruthful facts to unsuspecting masses of the American people. Trump’s election as president of the United States creates a dark cloud of uncertainty that hovers all over the current world affairs. Perhaps it’s time for a new dawn where globalization is seen as a threat rather than an opportunity. The people of the U.S.A have spoken. You cannot stop an idea whose time has come.